Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Online Technology Will Raise GDP
The Yomiuri Shimbun
The 2007 white paper on information and communication forecasts that if progress is made in transforming Japan into a more advanced online society, it would raise gross domestic product by about 1 percent in 2010.
Internal Affairs and Communications Minister Yoshihide Suga submitted the white paper at a Cabinet meeting Tuesday. In an advanced online society, people can be connected to computer networks anytime and anywhere.
According to the white paper, if such a society develops, working from home would increase as well as productivity. In this case, the increase in GDP would be 3.16 percent in 2010. But if there is a failure to meet the requirements necessary for a full-fledged online society, it would stand at 2.09 percent.
(Jul. 4, 2007)
A white paper in the above article is like a research report released by the federal government of the US. GDP stands for the nation's income. It tells us how rich on average the people are in the country.
As the above article says, an advanced online technology will enable us to work at home. We can cut a lengthy commute and spend more time on working by using an online technology. It will raise his/her productivity(or GDP per person) by spending more time on more valuable activities and more left time on leisure. I hope it'll be making us happier in such an online society.
By the way, does a blog contribute to a rise in GDP and people's happiness? A blog is one of the most advanced online technologies in the world and may be a great impact on our society: We can see so many diaries of unknown people through the blogs and talk with each other by posting our comment on what they say. Could the about 100-year ago people believe in such a fact? A blog contributes to connecting me in Japan and you in another country far away from Japan. If a blog raises GDP and the usefulness of our daily life, I think I should be proud of my being a blogger. What do you think of it?
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
Internationally Honorable Premier
Former Japanese PM Miyazawa dies
By Michiyo Nakamoto in Tokyo
Published: June 28 2007 09:18 Last updated: June 28 2007 15:58
...Mr Miyazawa was a prominent figure in Japanese politics whose career spanned half a century from when he was first elected to the Diet in 1953 until he retired in 2003. His death marks the end of an era in which Japan emerged from the ruins of the second world war, grew to become the second largest economy in the world, and suffered a prolonged economic slump from which it only escaped as Mr Miyazawa was preparing to retire.
Mr Miyazawa, a lifelong liberal conservative, was highly respected in international circles. He held key positions from an early age, becoming the youngest head of the then Economic Planning Agency at 43. His political career is not only unusual for its length and breadth but also for the fact that he served as finance minister twice – once briefly in the late 1980s and again a decade later between 1998 and 2002 at the tail end of Japan’s so-called lost decade.
He was known as a skilled administrator and an internationalist and was one of the few Japanese leaders who could conduct meetings in English. “There is no doubt that he was a skilled administrator, but he never became a mainstream LDP powerbroker,” says Takao Toshikawa, editor of Insideline, a current affairs newsletter.
Consequently, despite his sparkling political career, Mr Miyazawa only managed to win the premiership in 1991, aged 72. His premiership was plagued by scandal and came to an abrupt end in 1993 when he was faced with an opposition vote of no confidence, which passed as a result of an internal revolt within the LDP.
That incident led to the formation of a coalition government, the first government not controlled by the LDP since 1955.
Mr Miyazawa returned to the spotlight six years later when he was appointed finance minister at a time when Japan was mired in a banking crisis and deflation. His appointment drew criticism. He had failed while prime minister to tackle effectively the problem of Japanese banks’ non-performing loans, even though he understood that bold banking reforms would be necessary to deal with the aftermath of Japan’s asset deflation.
It was only in 2001 that Mr Miyazawa made the bold statement that Japan’s finances were “approaching collapse” and that “fundamental fiscal reform was necessary”. In his final stint as finance minister, Mr Miyazawa tried to resuscitate the moribund economy and lift the slumping stock market with an expansionary policy.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007
Honorable Premier
Kiichi Miyazawa, who, as prime minister and holder of many other top government posts, helped guide Japan from postwar ruin to economic superpower.
Kiichi Miyazawa, Japan Premier in the ’90s, Dies at 87
By DOUGLAS MARTIN
Published: June 29, 2007
The New York Times
....Kiichi Miyazawa, who, as prime minister and holder of many other top government posts, helped guide Japan from postwar ruin to economic superpower, died yesterday at his home in
Mr. Miyazawa emerged from a wealthy and politically powerful family to attain influence as an aide to policy makers who fashioned Japan’s immediate postwar recovery and went on to hold important cabinet posts, including that of foreign minister, before becoming prime minister in November 1991.
In his two years at the head of the government, he pushed for better ties with Japan’s Asian neighbors and was the first Japanese prime minister to acknowledge the involvement of the nation’s military in forcing Asian women to serve as sex slaves for soldiers.
His government passed a watershed law paving the way for Japan to send peacekeeping troops overseas, but resisted more profound changes in the pacifist Constitution. He negotiated a major trade accord with the United States and instituted banking reforms as he battled a gathering economic malaise that would endure for a decade.
As finance minister in 1986 and 1987, he won popularity with high levels of public works spending, financing some of it through privatization of government companies.
To Americans he was vividly etched in the public consciousness when in 1992, President Bush fell ill at a banquet during a trip to Japan and vomited on him. The prime minister cradled the head of the flu-stricken president in his lap afterward.
....His career was thought to have ended in December 1988, when he was forced to resign as finance minister because of his involvement in a corporate influence-peddling scandal. In 1993 he was ousted as prime minister after he could not pass political reform bills he had promised. That ended the Liberal Democratic Party’s 38 consecutive years of rule.
In a rare case of a former prime minister’s taking a lesser cabinet post, he returned to serve as finance minister at the age of 78 in 1998. He proposed a system of bilateral currency swaps between Asian countries that is still in place today.
Kiichi Miyazawa was born on Oct. 8, 1919, in Tokyo. His father represented the Hiroshima area in Parliament, and his mother came from a prominent political family. A teacher wrote on his report card, “He speaks his own mind, and some of his classmates don’t like his straightforwardness.”
He graduated from Tokyo Imperial University, and he attended a conference of American and Japanese students in the United States in 1939. His intellectual prowess allowed him to avoid military service in World War II.
In 1942 he joined the Finance Ministry and within seven years had become the minister’s private secretary. Like many Japanese, he recalled the American postwar occupation with distaste, particularly having to listen to lectures by Gen. Douglas A. MacArthur. “It may be hard for young people today to understand how unpleasant it was to live under the occupation,” he wrote in his memoirs.
Mr. Miyazawa was an aide to his country’s delegation at the peace conference in San Francisco in 1951. There, 49 nations restored “full sovereignty” to Japan while permitting the continuing presence of American troops on Japanese soil. From 1953 to 1965, Mr. Miyazawa served in the largely ceremonial upper house of Parliament. In 1967 he was elected to his father’s seat in the lower house. His government posts while a member of the house included general director of the Economic Planning Agency and minister of international trade and industry. He was also chairman of his party’s executive council.
....Mr. Miyazawa admired the United States as a student, and his excellent English allowed him to forge warm relationships with Americans. When he concluded a major trade pact with the United States in 1993, he attributed his success to charming President Clinton over a sushi dinner. He could also be provocative. As prime minister, he said Japan must show “compassion” for social problems like homelessness in the United States, and criticized Americans’ work ethic.
Sunday, July 01, 2007
デフレ日本
消費者物価 下落圧力なお 食品上げ及ばず6月30日10時20分配信 毎日新聞
全国消費者物価指数の動向
総務省が29日発表した5月の全国消費者物価指数(05年=100、生鮮食品を除く)が4カ月連続マイナスの前年同月比0.1%下落となったことで、物価下落圧力の大きさが改めて確認された。ガソリンや食品などの一部品目で値上げの動きも出てきたものの、物価水準そのものを引き上げるにはまだ力不足だ。
今回の発表で注目されたのは、全国指数の先行指標でもある6月の東京都区部指数(同、中旬速報値)。市場予想は前年同月比0.1%上昇だったが、実際には同0.1%下落だった。ガソリン価格の上昇から石油製品が5カ月ぶりに上昇したが「教養娯楽」(パック旅行、宿泊料など)、「被服及び履物」の下落幅拡大などが、その押し上げ効果をかき消した。 原材料価格の高騰などから食料品や生活用品で値上げの動きも相次いでいるが「東京の6月分の動きを見る限り、価格転嫁の目立った動きは確認されない」(ニッセイ基礎研究所)レベルにとどまった。このため6月の全国指数も「マイナスの状態からは抜け出せない」(第一生命経済研究所)可能性が高まった。ガソリン価格は値上がりが続いているが、昨年夏場のピークに比べればまだ低く、原油価格が横ばいの水準で推移すれば「8~9月には再び物価の押し下げ要因となる」(同)見通しだ。多くのエコノミストは、7~9月まで物価は前年比マイナス圏で推移し、上昇に転じるのは10~12月期からという見方を変えていない。【三島健二】
明るい政策
全くそのとおりである。デフレ下では、支出(需要)が抑制される。今日買い物をするよりも、明日買い物をした方が物の値段が安いから得なのである。つまり、実質利子率(名目利子率―インフレ率)がかなり高くなるので、将来の消費の効用が低めに割り引かれる結果、消費者の効用最大化行動により、今日の消費を増やすのを控え、明日の消費を増やそうとする。(Euler方程式の含意を思い出せ!)
支出が抑制されると、経済の供給は拡大しない。したがって、デフレを解消することが、経済の拡大の要因になりうる。デフレを解消するには、需要を拡大させる必要がある。つまり、インフレ期待を起こせば、実質利子率は低下し、今日の消費の効用が高まりうる。インフレ期待が起こることは、この点において、需要が拡大することと同義である。
しかしながら、ケインジアン的な財政拡張による需要の拡大(インフレ期待の創出)は、将来の増税を恐れる消費者の支出抑制行動により、支出(需要)が伸び悩む可能性がある。だたし、多くの消費者・企業が資金制約に直面していれば、その可能性は低い。
しかしながら、将来の経済の先行きが明るいことが明確になれば、すなわちインフレが期待されるような政策が行われれば、経済の支出は拡大し、実際に経済の成長は高まりうる。そして、竹中氏はこのような「明るい見通しを持った政策」が求められると主張しているのだ!
[大阪 30日 ロイター] 竹中平蔵慶応大学教授(前総務相)は30日、個人投資家向けのシンポジウムで講演し、マクロ経済運営の最優先課題はデフレの解消だと指摘、デフレ下では経済は拡大しない、と述べた。
また財政の建て直しも重要課題としたが、「2010年代初頭にプライマリーバランス(基礎的財政収支)を回復させるとの第一の目標達成には、消費税上げは全く必要ないことが明らかになりつつある。安倍政権も2011年度のプライマリーバランス回復は消費税なしでやると言えばよい。そのうえで、その後の社会福祉をどうするかは考える。一歩一歩前に進めていくことが重要だ」と述べた。
日本経済については「この4年間2%強で推移している。日本の潜在成長率は、内閣府試算では2%弱で、潜在成長力を上回る良い経済状況が続いている」と評価した。そのうえで米国の潜在成長力は3%強だとし、「(日本経済を)3%水準に上げていけるかが問われている」と強調した。来る参院選の争点についても「期待成長率を高める政党はどこかが問われるべきだ」と強調。
中期的な為替動向について竹中氏は(1)世界的な外貨準備の資産構成の変化、(2)改革実行による3%成長実現への期待──を挙げ、「これから円は高い方に振れるだろう」との見通しを示した。このうち、外貨準備の資産構成に関しては「世界的に外準の使われ方が急速に変わってきている」と指摘。世界の外貨準備の円建て資産比率は8年前の7%から、現在3%まで低下したが、日本経済の回復に伴い「円建て資産への潜在的な需要が高まる」とした。
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Translated To Nine Languages
I saw the Japanese version of Taro's blog. However, the Japanese in it is broken and very hard for the Japanese to read. Similarly the other languages may be also broken. You can also enjoy broken another language's version of Taro's blog!
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Fujimori Took The Plunge
By KANA INAGAKI Associated Press Writer
AP Photo/Santiago Llanquin
TOKYO (AP)
-- Disgraced Peruvian ex-President Alberto Fujimori will run in the July election for Japan's parliament despite being under house arrest in Chile, he said Thursday via telephone with the head of his Japanese political party.
Fujimori said he had accepted the request to run for the People's New Party in the upper house elections in a talk with party chief Shizuka Kamei.
"I will run as a proportional representational candidate for the People's New Party to work for Asian diplomacy, on the North Korea problem and for the safety of the Japanese public," Fujimori said in a phone conversation that Kamei hooked a speaker to so the audience in Tokyo could hear it.
Kamei said he wanted Fujimori - who holds Japanese citizenship - to put "his knowledge, rich experience and reputation" to use in Japan. "I strongly hope Mr. Fujimori, as the last samurai, will add vigor to today's Japanese society, which lacks courage, confidence and benevolence," he said.
Fujimori, 68, is under house arrest in Chile. Neighboring Peru wants to try him on charges including bribery, misuse of government funds and sanctioning death squad killings during his decade-long rule, which ended in 2000.
The PNP plans to ask the Foreign Ministry and the Japanese government to help ensure Fujimori can engage in electoral activities, and requests that Chile allow him to return, Kamei said.
Kiichi Miyazawa Died
元首相・宮沢喜一氏が死去
6月28日16時47分配信 読売新聞
宮沢喜一(みやざわ・きいち)元首相が、28日午後1時16分、老衰のため、東京都渋谷区神宮前6の34の1の自宅で死去した。87歳だった。 宮沢氏は自主憲法制定を綱領に掲げる自民党にあって、護憲、平和路線を追及する「ハト派」の中心的存在だった。 首相としては、自衛隊を初めて国連平和維持活動(PKO)に派遣し、その後の日本の外交戦略の方向を示した。政治改革をめぐっては自民党の分裂を招き、結党後初の野党転落に直面したが、経済危機の中で蔵相として再登板するなど、その後も活躍を続けた。 2003年衆院選の際、小泉首相の要請を受けて衆院議員を引退した後も党の新憲法起草などに関わった。
Japan's dovish ex-PM Miyazawa dies at 87
By Linda SiegReutersThursday, June 28, 2007; The Washington Post
TOKYO (Reuters) - Former Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa, whose career stretched from Japan's defeat in World War Two through the 1990s "lost decade" of economic stagnation, died on Thursday at the age of 87, his office said.
A finance expert at ease on the world stage and a diplomatic dove keen on better ties with Asia, Miyazawa first served as finance minister from 1986 to 1988, when low interest rates fuelled soaring stock and land prices.
He was forced to resign the post over a shares-for-favors scandal that ensnared his party -- only to return as prime minister just three years later.
For some, Miyazawa's most enduring image was captured in 1992 when he cradled the head of U.S. President George Bush in his lap after Bush collapsed at a state banquet in Tokyo.
But his tenure in Japan's top job was cut short in 1993 when ruling party rebels backed a no-confidence motion. That sparked an election in which scandal-weary voters ousted the long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party briefly for the only time in its five-decade reign.
Five years later, Miyazawa -- then a sprightly 78 -- was drafted for a rare second term as finance minister in an effort to avert a banking crisis in the world's second-biggest economy.
"I am not sure I will live up to your expectations, but I will do my best," the elder statesman said at the time. Within weeks, Miyazawa was jetting off to the United States for consultations and jousting at home with young lawmakers in both ruling and opposition parties who insisted on putting teeth into his plans for a painless banking bailout.
Ultimately, a financial system rescue was enacted, but it took another five years before Japan's banks were cleansed of the bad loan legacy from the collapse of the late 1980s asset bubble.
An aide in the Japanese delegation that negotiated the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty formally ending World War Two, Miyazawa was elected to parliament in 1953 and held many key cabinet posts. A fluent English speaker, he had close personal ties to America -- he met his Japanese wife while studying there, and his daughter is married to a U.S. diplomat.
Monday, June 25, 2007
Immigration And Emigration

Jun 25th 2007 From Economist.com
AFP
What caught my eye is that Japan is one of the emigration countries in the world. Most of the countries in the above list seem to be less developed than Japan. Why are the people in Japan leaving for another country though Japan is one of the most developed and affluent countries in the world?
Is Japan difficult to live in? The other day I saw a woman from Florida saying that the prices were high and rooms were small in Japan. She didn't seem to like Japan and said that she planed to go back to America the next year.
I also think that Japan isn't good to live in because the prices are higher than those in other countries. An affluent society may not be necessarily a good place to live in. It is not analytically clear, but the difficulty in living in Japan may keep some people from staying in Japan.
Sunday, June 24, 2007
Carbon Tax vs. Carbon Auction
The Best Idea for Reducing Global Warming
It's not a carbon tax and it's not a cap-and-trade system. It's a carbon auction.
Robert B. Reich June 20, 2007 web only
The best idea I've heard so far to deal with global warming is not a carbon tax. I can't imagine any politician calling for higher taxes affecting the middle class, or for that matter the middle class -- already squeezed by high energy prices and stagnant wages -- putting up with it.
....The best idea I've heard is described as a carbon auction. Companies would have to bid for the right to pollute. And, most ingeniously, the money raised in the auction would be shared equally by all citizens in the form of yearly dividend checks -- just like the residents of Alaska now get yearly dividends for their share of the state's oil revenues.
....In a carbon auction, companies would have to bid against other companies for a portion of the atmosphere they intend to use -- within overall limits that reduce pollution levels.
Get it? It's a win-win. The auction market itself determines who can pollute and by how much. And since companies will inevitably want to reduce their bidding costs, they'll search for new technologies that cut their emissions. And even if companies pass on increased costs to their customers, we'll still be better off because we'll get dividend checks and cleaner air.
This column is adapted from Reich's weekly commentary on American Public Radio's Marketplace.
To sum up his idea on reducing global warming:
(1) He's not for a carbon tax because higher taxes hit the middle class.
(2) He's for a carbon auction because the money raised in the auction would be shared equally by all citizens in the form of yearly dividend checks.
According to his views (1) and (2), he talks of a carbon tax and auction not in terms of efficiency but equity. What's the matter in his statement? To reduce global warming, a carbon tax and a carbon auction will be both effective measures. Rather to reduce the gap between the middle class and the executive class, a carbon auction might be more effective, as Reich says. However, there's no guarantee for the money to be shared equally among all the citizens. The companies that sell the right for the emission of carbon dioxide to other companies will get much of the revenue. It seems few citizens will get it. Because there's no incentive to have them equally get the money raised in the auction.
The Pigovian tax as well as the auction will let market determine who can pollute and by how much. And since companies (and consumers) want to reduce their payment of the tax on the emission of carbon dioxide, they'll search for new technologies that cut their emissions. And even if companies pass on increased costs to their customers, we'll still be better off because we'll get cleaner air.
Saturday, June 23, 2007
Why Japanese Women Talk To Themselves?
40% of young Japanese women talk to their computers, survey claims
Mainichi June 23, 2007
Two in five Japanese women in their 20s or 30s talk to their personal computer, according to a survey by mail forwarding company iShare Inc. and toymaker Sega Toys Co.
Young women are also likely to talk to themselves during times of high stress, or when they do something wrong, the survey reckons. Other computer-related habits include decorating their computers or work areas with stuffed toys, and in a few cases giving their computers names.
Of the 410 women in their 20s or 30s surveyed, 40.5 percent said that they talk to their computer.
....Talking to oneself at regular times was also common, with 59.2 percent of those surveyed saying that they did it. Stress was a frequent trigger for women to start talking to themselves, such as when caught driving behind a slow driver or upon making a mistake. Some women even said they started talking to themselves at times for no particular reason. Women who talked to themselves commonly felt "lonely" or "disgusted with themselves," according to the probe.
If you visit Japan, you might see some women talking to themselves in the street. In fact a few years ago I saw a young woman talking to herself at Ueno Station when I visited Tokyo, the capital of Japan. Of course, you may also see some men talking to themselves. Talking to oneself is not related to sex, I guess, but women seem to be more likely to talk to themselves than men.
Stress, the above article says, was a frequent reason for women to start talking to themselves, such as when caught driving behind a slow driver or upon making a mistake. The Japanese women may suffer much stress from their everyday workplace and life. And they may not know how to relax themselves by themselves. This may be the reason that aromatherapy has become so popular among them.
This is a trifling worry, if the men had some causes for the women to suffer stress, I might have to apologize to them in behalf of many of the Japanese men, "I'm sorry".
Well, anyway, I think this case should be researched more because it is thought to be closely related to the Japanese mental health.
You Want To Kill Yourself?
SuicideElusive, but not always unstoppable
Jun 21st 2007 From The Economist print edition
....one new trend that is clearly pushing the real incidence of suicide up is the growing use of the internet to learn about, plan or even encourage self-killing. ...Nowhere are such internet deaths more common than where they started—in Japan, whose suicide rate has long been among the highest of never-communist developed countries. Japan is a conformist society, and life, it is said, is bleak for those who do not fit in. It has a tradition of self-killing, which in some forms, such as the ritualised seppuku (“belly-cutting”) of the samurai, may still be deemed honourable, even noble. Public figures shamed by scandal often kill themselves.
...Certain differences can be readily explained. China is one of the few countries in which more women kill themselves than men. Over half the world's female suicides are Chinese; among Chinese under 45, the female rate is twice the rate among males. Why should things be different in China? Part of the explanation clearly lies in the high rate among rural women, which in turn may be partially explained by the ready availability of poisons (weedkillers and pesticides), and the absence of any effective treatment. Similar apparent anomalies may be explained by the ready availability of other poisons. Many Sri Lankans kill themselves by eating the seeds of the yellow oleander, a common shrub.
....Worldwide, indeed, suicide rates have increased by 60% in the past 45 years. About 1m people a year die at their own hands. Too many of these deaths are avoidable.
Have you ever thought of committing suicide? Happily I've never. And unhappily many people have thought of taking their own lives and in fact many of them have killed themselves. Suicide is an unhappy event. I am wondering what it is for when I see the articles of suicide in the newspaper.
But in my country, Japan, it seems that suicide tends to be traditionally beautified. I don't like this tendency and I think it immoral in terms of social norm and manner. Suicide gives nothing good to us. It is not taken pride in that the suicide rate in Japan has long been among the highest of never-communist developed countries.
As Emile Durkheim said, suicide rates were a key sign of the state of a community. It is right. And it is surprising that different countries have different ways of committing suicide. What is more, internet deaths are more common in today's society. Internet suicide seems to have a kind of externality and a negative effect on the society. In terms of economics, suicide is like an air pollution, which is also a great negative effect on the society and our lives and, if so, it should be prevented beforehand by some kinds of public policy.
When we make the policy to prevent it, we should think about the reason for them to take the plunge? In terms of economics, when the marginal benefit of suicide is greater than the marginal cost, they make such a final decision.
Interestingly, part of the reasons is the ready availability of poisons. If the availability of poisons induced them to kill themselves, the marginal benefit of suicide would be greater than the marginal cost and there would be room for public policy to prevent them from suicide, say, by raising the cost of taking poisons.
In fact, the suicide rates in Britain have fallen significantly thanks to legislation that allows drugs such as paracetamol to be sold only in small quantities. This public policy seems to succeed in raising the cost of taking toxic drugs and preventing them from suicide. However the public policy isn't always successful: Some Indian states pay bereaved families compensation for the loss of a breadwinner who has killed himself; This seems to raise the suicide rate. It is a interesting fact.
In this case, if a breadwinner thought more highly of the welfare of his wife and children than that of himself, he would likely commit suicide to raise his family's welfare. In other words, if he had an altruistic utility, the marginal benefit of suicide would be higher to him. This policy fails in preventing suicide but succeeds in giving him an incentive to kill himself.
There might be much discussion on whether public policy should prevent it or not before discussing how to prevent suicide. It is a normative idea whether public policy should do it. But if suicide clearly had a harmful effect on the society and the citizens' lives and the marginal benefit of preventing it were higher than the marginal cost, the policymakers should have some options to prevent it to raise the social welfare.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Fujimori For Diet
SAO PAULO (Kyodo) Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori, under house arrest in Chile and facing possible extradition to Peru, has been tapped by a minor Japanese opposition party to run in the upcoming House of Councilors election, party sources said Monday.
Fujimori, 68, has apparently given no clear-cut reply to the offer by Kokumin Shinto (People's New Party), which plans to continue trying to persuade him to run, the sources said.
If Fujimori declares his candidacy, he would be the first former leader of a country other than Japan to run in a Japanese national election.
...Kamei is believed to admire Fujimori's political skills, seen in such accomplishments during his 10-year rule of Peru beginning in 1990 as resolving territorial disputes with Ecuador and rebuilding the Peruvian economy.
...Earlier this month, the Chilean Supreme Court ordered Fujimori held under house arrest on grounds that he may flee. Fujimori, indicted in Peru on more than 20 counts of corruption and human rights violations, was arrested by Chilean police on Nov. 7, 2005.
Fujimori graduated from UWM that I am going to this August to study econ. I'm surprised at this news. But I don't think he will be a good statesman in the Japanese diet. He speaks Japanese, doesn't he? How much does he know about the life and the people in Japan?
Fujimori certainly has a Japanese name, but he is not a Japanese himself. He was not born and raised up in Japan. Japan is different from what visitors from abroad see as Japan.
I strictly hope he will decline the offer to run for the House of Councilors this July.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
You'd be so nice to come home to
You'd be so nice to come home to
You'd be so nice to come home to
You'd be so nice by the fire
While the breeze on high, sang a lullaby
You'd be all that I could desire
Under stars chilled by the winter
Under an August moon burning above
You'd be so nice
You'd be paradise
To come home to and love
You'd be so nice to come home to
You'd be offer nice by the fire
While the breeze upon high, sang a lullaby
You'd be all that I could desire
Under stars chilled by the winter
Under an August moon burning up there above
You'd be so nice
Just like paradise
To come home to and love
A famous Jazz singer, Nancy Wilson, sings this song in a strong and sometimes a fascinating voice and I love it.
This song is originally one that a man sings for his woman, not vice verse. However, I usually hear it sung by female vocalist. It may be better for a woman to sing for her man.
Universities In Wisconsin
Stronger Women
Wealthy women
Sex and money
Jun 14th 2007 From The Economist print edition
By 2020 over half of Britain's millionaires may be female. Why?
IN APRIL this year, 92 females graced the Sunday Times Rich List, an annual round-up of Britain's 1,000 wealthiest people. Ten years ago there were 64. And rich women are getting richer, too: over the decade the average worth of female millionaires has grown by more than half.
Today Britain's wealthiest woman has £4.9 billion ($9.6 billion) to her name, compared with the paltry £1.5 billion her counterpart had in 1997. The Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) reckons female millionaires will outnumber male ones by 2020, and by 2025 women will control 60% of the nation's private wealth. They do better at school and in higher education, and they live longer. Girl power, it seems, never had it so good.
....the historical sources of women's wealth—marriage, inheritance and divorce—have been replaced by independent income, business ownership and investments. More than 80% of women now derive their riches from personal earnings, it says, particularly from their own businesses.
But Philip Beresford, who compiles the Rich List, dismisses the idea that women are breaking into its ranks independently of men....The woman who tops the list is in fact Lady Green, whose husband made them both a fortune in retailing.
....If things look sticky at the top, women at the bottom find the relative going far tougher. Although the gap between men's and women's earnings has shrunk for those at all income levels, it remains far bigger among the poorest tenth than in any other group (see chart).
....men still dominate highly paid work, and the proportion of female graduates in low-level jobs has rocketed in the past decade, along with the number of people going to university.
The above fact is in Britain but not in our country, Japan. I want to know about it in Japan. The report of CEBR that by 2025 women will control 60% of the nation's private wealth is surprising. If it is true, the social standing of women will be much higher than that of men. Few women will feel anxiety about her own treatment and payment in her workplace by being a woman.
In Britain more than 80% of women now derive their riches from personal earnings, it says, particularly from their own businesses. More women seem to be stronger, but many are making them both a fortune with her husband.
In a more calm research, men still dominate highly paid work, and the proportion of women in low-level jobs has rocketed in the past decade.
I think men's high pay is not due to the difference of any career opportunity that women are given and much less the incompetence of women, but due to the choice that women make. Many women are doing the housework (some may say that women are being forced to do that by men) and have no time to do a full-time job. They usually have a part-time job to supplement her husband's income.
Many women choose to do a part-time job, while many men a full-time job. The tendency is going down, but it seems to remain the same though the workplaces for women have been pursued for long time. The reason that men relatively dominate highly paid job is clear: Many women still choose to do a part-time job, while many men a full-time job.
More women choose a full-time job since they have more chances to have her housework done by someone and to work outside and it takes less time to do it. For that reason, the wage gap between men and women is shrinking. But it won't vanish as long as women choose a less-pay job.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
John Kenneth Galbraith
He is the most well-known economist among general people all over the world: John Kenneth Galbraith is one of the American economists who made me like studying economics. Of course, today's economics can't be learned just by him. My economics is also today's one that most econ students study. I used to read his books. More than one year has passed since his death. I've not read his book through in English yet, but I'll try it someday.
As an undergrad student, I read his pieces in an English class but couldn't understand his English. Then I had read it in Japanese and the Japanese was very difficult for me to read. I remember that it took many hours to read even one page of it. At that time I was told to read it to be a good econ learner, so I read it.
At first I thought the translator was poor at putting him into Japanese, but I found it wrong. His English is also difficult! It is not straight and clear. When I tried the Mankiw's econ text in English, I wondered how easy the English was.
However, now I think his books should be read by more (econ) students. Because it seems that his books make us patient with much rhetoric English. I want to read his English faster and write English here like him. If I expressed my ideas here like him, more people would think me meaningful and respect me.
Unfortunately I have to do much more math for the grad study in the US, so I will have no time to read him.
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Is Recycling Beneficial For Us?
The truth about recyclingJun 7th 2007From The Economist print edition
IT IS an awful lot of rubbish. Since 1960 the amount of municipal waste being collected in America has nearly tripled, reaching 245m tonnes in 2005. According to European Union statistics, the amount of municipal waste produced in western Europe increased by 23% between 1995 and 2003, to reach 577kg per person. (So much for the plan to reduce waste per person to 300kg by 2000.) As the volume of waste has increased, so have recycling efforts. In 1980 America recycled only 9.6% of its municipal rubbish; today the rate stands at 32%. A similar trend can be seen in Europe, where some countries, such as Austria and the Netherlands, now recycle 60% or more of their municipal waste. Britain's recycling rate, at 27%, is low, but it is improving fast, having nearly doubled in the past three years....“We are constantly being asked: Is recycling worth doing on environmental grounds?”
But the practice of shipping recyclables to China is controversial. Especially in Britain, politicians have voiced the concern that some of those exports may end up in landfills.
More generally, one of the biggest barriers to more efficient recycling is that most products were not designed with recycling in mind. Remedying this problem may require a complete rethinking of industrial processes, says William McDonough, an architect and the co-author of a book published in 2002 called “Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things”.
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
A Saddle Point And Consumer Behavior
For a function of two or more variables, the surface at a saddle-point resembles a saddle that curves up in one or more directions, and curves down in one or more other directions. ....For example, two hills separated by a high pass will show up a saddle point, at the top of the pass,....
A saddle point is a very important idea for economics, though it is somewhat mathematical. For econ learners, it is necessary to keep it in mind.
An econ example is about the consumer's utility maximization problem(UMP):
Suppose he or she had two kinds of goods: apples and oranges. The price of an apple is p, and the price of an orange is q. The number of apples is A, and the number of oranges is O. He or she has a utility function like U(A,O). It expresses his preference and assumes that the more oranges or apples he gets the happier he becomes. His income is M. And then his or her utility maximization problem is:
max U(A,O)
such that pA+qO≦M
When an economist usually solves the above problem, she uses the Lagrangian function:
L(A,O,l)=U(A,O) - l(pA+qO-M)
where l is the Lagrange multiplier, or the marginal utility of income.(If you see it as the marginal utility of income, differenciate L with respect to M and you get l. As M increases L also increases. The multiplier l is the rate of change of L to a small change in M. )
And she differentiates L with respect to A,O and l to get the first-order necessary conditions for the maximization problem.
f.o.c.
dL/dA=dU/dA - lp=0....(1)
dL/dO=dU/dO - lq=0....(2)
dL/dl=- (pA+qO-M)≧0,
l(pA+qO-M)=0 and l≧0....(3)
The above conditions are called "the Kuhn-Tucker necessary conditions". (Note that dL/dx means the partial derivative.) The Kuhn-Tucker conditions (or the Kuhn-Tucker Theorem) say that there exists l such that dL/dA=dU/dA - lp=0, dL/dO=dU/dO - lq=0 and dL/dl=- (pA+qO-M)=0.
And the condition (3) says that l>0 and -(pA+qO-M)>0 cannot hold at the same time. (Of course, l=0 and (pA+qO-M)=0 can hold simultaneously.)
If l=0, then -(pA+qO-M)≧0. In this case, this problem is unconstrained. And so you can solve the problem just by equating the derivatives of U(A,O) with respect to A and O to zero.
If l>0, then -(pA+qO-M)=0. In this case, this problem is constrained to income. And so you can solve the problem by solving the simultaneous equations of A,O and l, (1), (2) and (3).
Well, I'll reach the conclusion soon. The optimal solutions (A*,O*,l*) are at a saddle point: These give the maxima of the utility in A and O, and the minimum in l. That is, for a function of two variables A and O, the surface at a saddle-point curves up in two directions of A and O, and curves down in one other direction of l.
The meaning is simple. If you have a little more income left, you would be better to spend it on goods in order to make your utility as large as possible. If you maximize your utility, no income is left. That's the optimum!
Appendix:
If you have a maximization problem with nonnegative constraints, you'll have the following first-order conditions:
max U(A,O)
such that pA+qO≦M, A≧0 and O≧0
f.o.c.
dL/dA=dU/dA - lp≦0, A(dL/dA)=0 and A≧0....(1)'
dL/dO=dU/dO - lq≦0, O(dL/dO)=0 and O≧0....(2)'
dL/dl=- (pA+qO-M)≧0, l(pA+qO-M)=0 and l≧0....(3)'
Sunday, June 10, 2007
A Big Saver Spends More?
Saving graceMay 3rd 2007
From The Economist print edition
.....But could higher interest rates boost Japanese consumer spending? EVERY economics student learns that higher interest rates depress growth by curbing borrowing and spending. That, according to the conventional wisdom, is why the Bank of Japan (BoJ) must continue to hold interest rates at historically low levels; a rise in rates would risk tipping the economy back into recession and deflation.
Yet a few brave economists believe, to the contrary, that higher interest rates would actually encourage households to spend more, not less.
....The problem is that ultra-low interest rates risk creating economic distortions, such as the excessively weak yen, asset-price bubbles, or inefficient investment. Worse, low interest rates may themselves be discouraging consumers from opening up their wallets.
Debtors gain from low interest rates but savers lose, and Japanese households have the biggest stash of savings (relative to their income) among developed economies. Their net financial assets, excluding equities, amount to 3.2 times personal disposable income, compared with a ratio of only 1.9 in America and 1.1 in Germany (see left-hand chart). Over half of Japanese households' gross financial assets are in deposits that earn adjustable rates of interest (in America the figure is just over one-tenth), but only one-quarter of their liabilities are at floating interest rates.
.....Julian Jessop of Capital Economics. The impact of higher interest rates on spending depends upon the relative size of the income effect (higher rates boost income and hence expenditure) and the substitution effect (higher rates encourage people to save more). For small changes in interest rates, says Mr Jessop, the income effect may dominate, but for large changes the substitution effect may be more important.
Today is about macroeconomics. In Japan there exists a hot discussion whether BOJ (the Bank of Japan) should raise the interest rate or not. It is open to dispute politically and theoretically:
(1) Higher interest rates depress growth by curbing borrowing and spending. A rise in rates would risk tipping the economy back into recession and deflation.
(2) Higher interest rates would actually encourage households to spend more, not less. An ultra-low interest rates risk creating economic distortions, such as the excessively weak yen, asset-price bubbles, or inefficient investment.
Which sight is right? As Julian Jessop of Capital Economics says, it depends on the relative size of the income effect and the substitution effect.
Higher interest rates have two effects on the Japanese economy: income effect and substitution effect. This idea is convincing from the viewpoint of economics. Income effect means more income (and thus more expenditure) led by more interest revenue in the bank account due to higher rates, whereas the substitution effect more saving due to higher rates.
And for small changes in interest rates, says Mr. Jessop, the income effect may dominate, but for large changes the substitution effect may be more important.
Judgement on which is effective is related to empirics, so theory doesn't suggest that BOJ should raise the interest rate. However, my guess is that most of the Japanese people don't spend more but save more. The reason is that most of us have less to buy.
Rich countries like Japan also have the income and substitution effects of how wealthy they are; In richer countries, the richer people become, the more they buy(income effect), or the more they save(substitution effect). In rich countries consumers have two choices to make: to buy goods and service and to buy monetary goods. Monetary goods, which I coin, include saving, stock, bond and any financial derivatives.
One of my old teachers told me about the reason of recession: They spend less on goods but more on monetary goods like stock and bond. The more they earn, the more they desire not for goods but for saving, stock and bond. And thus the aggregate demand for goods decrease. Why do they pursue financial assets? Because they want no more goods.
However, whether they want goods or not depends on the relative size of the income effect and the substitution effect. And for small changes in wealth, the income effect may dominate, but for large changes the substitution effect may be more important.
In historical perspective, we Japanese have become much more wealthy since the end of WWⅡ. For large changes in national wealth, the substitution effect may be stronger than the income effect. And that's why we suffered an almost 10-year-long deflationary recession. What do you think of it? Let me know your frank comment!
Saturday, June 09, 2007
Optimum Currency Area
Since then, I have wanted to study the relationship between the currency union and the international integration.
Friday, June 08, 2007
A Lovely Voice
Jazz is one of the most respected American cultures. I want more younger people to listen to it.
The First Anniversary of Taro's Blog!!
In fact, though it has been here for one year, it has not been known to and seen by many bloggers yet. But I'll continue writing about economics and our daily life vividly from my original point of view!
Here's a good news: Dr.Mark Thoma, a professor of the Department of Economics, University of Oregon, and the host of Economist's View, one of the well-known econ blogs in the US, links to my blog. I am grateful to Economist's View and Dr. Mark Thoma for linking to it.
Main character of my blog is to write like a diary. Of course, sometimes I write personal issues unrelated to econ, but most of what I write here is about econ and the related issues.
Most of the posts are easy for readers without the knowledge of economics and, even though my econ sight and English expressed here might be incorrect and misread, are likely to be useful to study introductory economics or to think like an economist.
I've not yet have the PhD in Economics, but I try to make the social issues as clear as possible and to continue writing this econ blog. I would like you to hope for the success, thank you!
Thursday, June 07, 2007
A Girl From France
Today's excerpt is introduced by Mr. Kudamatsu. The story is about a life in the Kansai Area, where I was born and raised up.
'I'm always out and about'
By Muriel Roche
Published: April 28 2007 03:00 Last updated: April 28 2007 03:00
Muriel Roche, 41, was born in southern France near the Mediterranean port of Toulon. She carries out genetic diagnostic tests for a laboratory in Kobe, Japan.
I arrived in Kobe in 2005. My apartment is in the upper part of town, a 15-minute walk from the clinic. I'm on the 9th and top floor with lovely views of the sea and the mountains. I have a bedroom and a dining room with an open-plan kitchen. I'm lucky enough to have a Japanese room with tatami on the floor and cupboards that store the futons. It's a room for receiving visitors, with a small low table for meals. I don't use it much because for me sitting cross-legged for a long time isn't much fun.
Work is in English. My boss is bilingual. I don't give orders but things have to happen quickly. I don't have time to think and it comes out easier in English. I've been learning Japanese, laboriously, for a year. I started with an intensive group course. There were lots of Chinese - who already have an advantage with the writing, which they can understand, and the sounds, which aren't that dissimilar. There were only three Europeans. "So there'll be at least two gaijin [foreigners] with me," I thought. Not at all! They were both married to Japanese women. I was nowhere near their level and didn't manage to keep up. I quickly switched to private lessons - one hour a week, so progress is much slower.
....I love museums; we had an exhibition on the Silk Road that was phenomenal. I'm in the Kansai area, one of the best places for gardens and temples. Kyoto isn't far, half an hour on the shinkansen [high-speed train]. When I'm not working, I'm always out and about.
And the sumo wrestling! The next basho - tournament - is in Osaka. I've got my tickets to go for two days. It takes place over 15 days but I can't go daily because I'm working. I love the ceremonial aspect. I like the strength. Everybody thinks it's just fat but there are lots of muscles underneath - and a suppleness to allow competitors to sidestep their opponent's attacks. I like the bouts, the holds. It's quite spectacular. There are six tournaments a year - three in Tokyo, one in Osaka, one on the island of Kyushu and one at Nagoya.
....I don't like all Japanese cuisine. I have a problem with the seaweed. There's a lot of it and the taste, well, we're just not used to it. Then there are unbearable things like natto. That's something that, frankly, would make me leave the room. I think it's fermented soya beans - with an absolutely pestilential smell. It's a product of decomposition. I was made to try it once. I had no idea what it was. They're convinced that it's good for the intestines. That may well be but I'd treat myself differently.
...Recently we visited a restaurant and started with the fugu sashimi, then the rest of the fish was prepared as nabe, a kind of pot au feu. We ate the whole fish. It was to die for. You often sit in small side rooms, which is rather intimate and adorable.
Japan is an amazing place to some visitors from abroad. Those who don't have an interest in Asian countries may think of Japan as part of China. China is very different from Japan. Needless to say, both countries are worth visiting. If you have much time and money, you would enjoy the stay though there might be few English speakers and you might have some hard time in getting in touch with the local people.
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Hello, A Baby!
By KOZO MIZOGUCHI Associated Press Writer
TOKYO (AP) -- The fertility rate - the average number of children born to a woman over her lifetime - stood at 1.32 babies per woman in 2006, up 0.06 point from a record low of 1.26 in 2005, the Health Ministry said on its Web site.
"The latest figure alone doesn't indicate whether there is a turnaround in the country's recent trend of falling number of births," said Emi Sato of the vital statistic division with the Health Ministry.
....Ministry officials say the rise in the country's fertility rate was due partly to Japan's economic recovery from a decade-long slowdown, which encouraged more people to get married and have babies.
....A declining birth rate - a figure that expresses the number of children born every year in a given population - threatens Japan with a potential a labor shortage, tax shortfalls and pension problems as fewer taxpayers support an aging population.
In an international comparison, the fertility rate in the United States was 2.6 in 2005 and 2.1 in France, both preliminary figures, the report said. It was 1.36 in Germany, 1.33 in Italy, 1.75 in Sweden, all in 2004, and 1.71 in Britain in 2003. The fertility rate stood at 1.13 in South Korea, 1.25 in Singapore.
...Some local governments offer special subsidies for couples to have more babies. But many Japanese companies typically expect long hours from workers, and many women with careers feel they cannot meet the demands of both work and family and have to choose one or the other.
Three interesting points are:
(1) The rise in the country's fertility rate was due partly to Japan's economic recovery from a decade-long slowdown, which encouraged more people to get married and have babies.
It shows that there may exist a positive correlation between the country's fertility rate and the economic boom. The sight that the aggregate economic activities affect the fertility is interesting. We may have some important policy implications in controlling the population.
(2) Some local governments offer special subsidies for couples to have more babies.
I would like to know about the socioeconomic effects of the special subsidies for more babies. Are the subsidies or tax cuts for more babies really effective? Do women have the decision function that includes a tax as a variable? Is the derivative of the function with respect to tax negative? This is a good empirics, I think.
(3) A declining birth rate threatens Japan with a potential labor shortage, tax shortfalls and pension problems as fewer taxpayers support an aging population.
The problem of the decrease in tax and pension revenue due to fewer workers who support the old people is open to further dispute. The related issue is going to be reported in this blog. However, more Japanese are worried about the negative effects of the today's declining birth rate and are mumbling that the shortfall of tax revenue and pension benefit due to fewer children and aging population are coming to them soon. Is it right? Is it a groundless fear? I'll make it clear later.
Worry About Global Warming
Today's excerpt is from the Yomiuri Shimbun, the most popular newspapers in Japan: Seventy-one percent of respondents in a recent Yomiuri Shimbun survey cited global warming as their chief worry regarding changes to the environment.
The Yomiuri Shimbun
The survey also found that 67 percent of respondents said they "want" or were "quite keen" to use bioethanol as automobile fuel.
The survey covered 3,000 eligible voters in interviews at 250 locations nationwide on May 19 and 20. Of them, 1,803 people, or 60.1 percent, responded.
....The latest survey shows that an increasing number of people are worried about global warming and its link to increases in carbon dioxide emissions from the consumption of oil and coal, with changes in the climate being felt in Japan in extreme summer heat and an unusually warm winter.
....Specifically regarding global warming, 72 percent of respondents said they were concerned about the deterioration of the environment due to such phenomena as heat waves, floods and cold snaps, which have become more pronounced in recent years.
Asked if Japan should step up diplomatic pressure on China and the United States, which are the world's largest carbon dioxide emitting nations, 92 percent of respondents said yes.
....On the environmental impact of global warming, 52 percent of respondents cited worries about the deterioration in living environments by decreases in agricultural products due to more frequent regional heavy rain and droughts. Fifty-one percent said they were concerned about rising sea levels, while 41 percent were worried that the fisheries industry would be adversely affected with changes in the marine ecosystem. This was followed by 39 percent who cited concerns about changes in farming areas due to desertification.
(Jun. 6, 2007)
More Japanese are getting interested in the environment issues and the related TV programs often broadcast. It is a good trend, I think. I am also interested in the global warming, especially the economic impacts of it. I'll have a comment on it in this blog later.
By the way, Al Gore's book, "An inconvenient Truth", becomes popular among the Japanese readers. I have not read it yet. If you've read it already, let me know your comments on it.
Saturday, June 02, 2007
Friday, June 01, 2007
Will You Marry Me?
Every year, as might be expected, the American Wedding Study’s* tally of the amount spent by Americans on getting married increases: from about $22,000 in 2003 to more than $26,000 in 2005 to, in 2006, a grand total of $27,852 …
According to the 2006 study, Americans were spending $14 billion annually on engagement rings, wedding rings, and other items of jewelry. They were purchasing just over $7 billion worth of wedding gowns, tuxedos, flower girl outfits, bridesmaids’ dresses, veils, satin shoes, gloves, stoles, and other items of wedding attire....
It is an interesting fact. Why do they marry? And why do they spend so much money on their wedding? Economists generally reason it: A wedding is a kind of "commitment".
Commitment is the strategic issue that is paid attention to on the games with sequential moves. Sequential moves mean that, for example, if one of the two players in some game moved first the other would make his or her choice by knowing what one player was choosing (or had chosen).
This sort of game is very popular. And the commitment is also very popular among us in our daily life. For example, if you and I walk straight at opposite ends of the street, we both will crash into each other and be injured. And if you or I swerve first, we won't crash.
What should we do in order not to crash into each other? If I forced myself to choose straight, you would choose to swerve, and vice versa. And how do I force myself to do that? For example, I should wear the glasses that enable me to see just only straight and not to see around there. And then you would choose to swerve in the street when you saw me walk to you and wear such glasses.
A wedding is like such a straight-walk game. If I forced myself to choose her, she would choose me as her lifelong partner, and vice versa. And then how do I force myself to do that? For example, I should give her a big, very expensive present like a big, shining diamond ring with the certificate.
Note that this committed choice, a big present for my fiance, must be both irreversible and observable to her; otherwise she couldn't be persuaded to make a big decision(marry me). What is both irreversible and observable to my fiance? This is the question!
The fact that the amount of money spent on wedding is increasing might show us that more men are afraid that their fiances will change their minds and are trying to persuade them to choose themselves.